|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
In Reply to: Nope, that is not it. posted by #####
#####:
: Your sin would demonstrate that you are indeed incapable of following : God, and would underline his grace even more. It is the logical
: conclusion of your "I'm not capable of doing nothing, and God loves
: me for it" message.
------Charlie:
And of course YOU *never* sin, thus demonstrating that you are incapable of following God, do you dear brother?Welcome board readers to more arminian double-speak and judgmental hypocricy that always addresses the subject of SIN with--"YOU!"
Paul taught the restoration of all things, as Romans 5 makes clear in the last several verses saying, "Where sin abounded grace MUCH MORE abounded!" And then, we find at the start of chapter 6 that he says, "Shall we sin more that grace may abound?"
If Paul were an Arminian that question would never have come up. Furthermore, Romans 5 would have been written so as to CLEARLY demonstrate that only a few would ever be saved. And instead of the question being "So Paul, you're saying that we can just sin more so that grace will abound all the more?" the question would have been--
"Since few ever will find the narrow way, how much can I sin and still be saved?"
Or--"How much walking in the Spirit daily is enough?"